Senin, 30 September 2019

The Bay

Watch Movies TV -***DISCLAIMER*** The following review is entirely my opinion. If you comment (which I encourage you to do) be respectful. If you don't agree with my opinion (or other commenters), that's fine. To each their own. These reviews are not meant to be statements of facts or endorsements, I am just sharing my opinions and my perspective when watching the film and is not meant to reflect how these films should be viewed. Finally, the reviews are given on a scale of 0-5. 0, of course, being unwatchable. 1, being terrible. 2, being not great. 3, being okay. 4, being great and 5, being epic! And if you enjoy these reviews feel free to share them and follow the blog or follow me on Twitter (@RevRonster) for links to my reviews and the occasional live-Tweet session of the movie I'm watching! Sitting on the dock of the bay, watching the horror come out an play.

 


The Bay – 3 out of 5

The “found footage” subgenre of horror films has always been a bit hit-or-miss for me—with more misses than hits.  The whole foundation of the subgenre has been less than stable with most of the films and when they feel lazily thrown together they are easy for me to tune out of and start to question why the hell the characters are filming the whole thing when it no longer makes any logical sense.  When the story is strong it is easy to ignore and not pay attention to the subgenre’s inherent short comings but so few accomplish this.  The Bay came out in 2012 and I kinda ignored it due to, most likely, fatigue from the shaky POV style story telling.  However, the film was directed by a man who has never done a horror film before so that naturally makes it kinda interesting.  Recently, I decided to give it a shot and, for the film being made by the same guy who gave us Rain Man and Good Morning, Vietnam it’s not a bad feature…but it’s still not a great horror film or an amazing achievement for “found footage” features.

Now, if I was in her place, I wouldn't stop screaming due to the growths on
my skin.

"Alright gang, let's try the 'sitting still so they think
the video chat is frozen' method of getting out of helping
this town."
In a small Chesapeake Bay town, a sudden and very deadly sickness hits the residents.  Two researchers found evidence of a possible toxic outbreak but the mayor ignored the warnings for fear it would cause a mass panic but now nearly the entire population of the town is sick with mysterious boils and rashes all over their bodies.  A young local news reporter and her cameraman are attempting to document what is occurring while the ER’s doctor attempts to figure out what is going on and tries to get the CDC involved.  However, they soon learn that it isn’t a virus striking the town but rather a mutated parasite that is eating its victims from the inside out…

"Ewwww gross!  Set the fish, the boat and myself on fire to kill this thing!"

She's incredibly calm for one who is being approached
by a dozen doctors in that gear.
The Bay suffers a lot of the usual problems that all “found footage” films suffer from.  Essentially, the story is unfolded through several characters and, sadly, most of them make no sense to why they are filming their trials and tribulations so much.  In the cases of the researchers and the young journalist, their documentations and their reasons for filming everything were something you don’t think twice about but when it concerns, for example, a young family taking a boat to meet loved ones in the town there were a lot of times where I found myself wondering why the hell are they filming this.  Especially when they arrive and everything seems out of place.  This caused the film to have a reality that simultaneously felt authentic but inauthentic as well.  It sorta jumped back and forth from a great suspension of disbelief to complete and utter disbelief.

Well, that contest was obviously rigged.  She's clearly a human and not a
crustacean.

The cast in the film are pretty decent and all are capable of legitimizing the “reality” the story is trying to create.  They all feel like real people in the real world but the strongest aspect this film has working for it is the buildup and establishment of its center conflict.  Watching the town get sick and seeing the people trying to figure out what is happening is very suspenseful and, at times, very unsettling and frightening.  Most importantly, however, it is extremely engaging and sucked me in immediately.  Sadly, this level of griping entertainment isn’t held for the entire running length and after the whole ordeal is understood and as the film reaches its final act, the story starts to reach its limits and the whole thing becomes repetitive—there are multiple scenes in a matter of just a few minutes where a character sees a body, says, “What the hell?” and then is scared that they just found a dead person.  

"The Human Torch was denied a bank loan."

The Bay starts strong and has a great cast.  The story might have some of the usual “found footage” shortcomings but it’s definitely unnerving and suspenseful and does a tremendous job at setting up the terror.  It sadly unravels and loses steam towards the end but considering this was made by a director who has never done horror it’s not a bad jumping off point.  I respect when creators challenge themselves to something new and while director Barry Levinson may not have made something that will be forever remembered in the world of horror, he showed off something pretty damn good and something that never felt like a lazy excuse to use the “found footage” subgenre.

Okja (4 Stars)

Watch Movies TV -

"Never mistranslate. Translations are sacred".

This is a South Korean film, with some of the dialogue in English. It's distributed exclusively by Netflix, so if you weren't lucky enough to see it on the big screen during its original release, it's too late now. Some Netflix films are released on Blu-ray, but not "Okja".

The Mirando corporation has created genetically modified giant pigs in order to solve world hunger and make a profit. They know that the public is opposed to genetically modified food, so they claim that the pigs are offsprings of a rare type of pig found in the wild. To win popularity for their pigs a lengthy promotional campaign is staged. 26 piglets are sent to farmers around the world, and after 10 years the most beautiful pigs will be selected for breeding.

The film is centred around Okja, a female pig raised by an old farmer in the mountains of Korea. He doesn't have to do much, because the pig has been adopted by his granddaughter Mija. For her Okja is more than a farmyard animal, she's a pet, even a friend.

After 10 years Okja is collected to be taken back to America. This is devastating for Mija. She attempts to prevent this happening, and she has unexpected allies. The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) attacks the transport convoy and attempts to steal Okja.


A lot of people don't like CGI in films, but this is an example of CGI making the film what it is. The giant pig has been perfectly crafted by the film's special effects engineers, and it looks so sweet and lovable. Okja is the real star of the film, and Okja's co-star is Ahn Seo-hyun, who was 13 when the film was made. The big names in the film, Jake Gyllenhaal, Tilda Swinton and Paul Dano, only appear in minor roles.

It's worth pointing out that Jake Gyllenhaal plays a very untypical role for him, as the obnoxious television host Dr. Johnny Wilcox. We can't help but hate him whenever he appears on the screen.

Success Rate:  - 23.8

The Rotting Zombie's Round-up of Horror News for September 2019

Watch Movies TV -

Getting towards the colder months now here in the UK, though the weather has yet to catch up aside from a bit of rain. Secretly I much prefer the cold weather to the sometimes heat of summer. First off is news concerning me. The fifth annual 15 Second Horror Film Challenge is due to take place later this year. People submit their 15 second horror films which then get judged in a series of categories. I'm happy to announce that this year I have been asked to be on the award panel, so I am looking forward to doing that. Film entries can be submitted for free until October 14th via here.

I'm starting off with something that only incidentally relates to horror, but I'm writing this post while slightly hungover and I found the music to be quite easy listening for my current mood. Pop-flavoured synthwave artist The Bad Dreamers (David Schuler) has released a new single, Georgetown that contains within it some subtle nods to horror in both the music and the lyrics. The Bad Dreamers creates a nostalgic feeling of the eighties so you should check out his stuff, as listening to it while writing this post I have become slightly addicted myself.



Drag queen horror flick Killer Unicorn has now come to VOD/DVD thanks to Indican Pictures. Described as 'American Psycho with a big ol' dash of Rocky Horror Picture Show' this is about a unicorn mask wearing killer in Brooklyn who targets drag queens.
The trailer for sci-fi/horror drama Three Mirrors Creature's Flashes of Flesh has debuted online. This experimental drama is the directorial debut for writer/cinematographer Giuliano Tomassacci. It stars Michela Bruni who 'in the aftermath of an emotional shock, becomes pervaded by a sensory spirit and undertakes a purifying - although grievous - voyage'. If the film is anything like the six and a half minute trailer then it certainly is going to be very experimental. As a warning the trailer features flashing imagery.



Next up is the trailer for Australian horror Turbines which is about two immigrants who get jobs working on a wind farm in rural Australia. They soon run into a whole host of problems from narrow-minded locals to immigration officers. It's not really made clear but the blurb seems to suggest this could be down to the wind turbines themselves? I hope it is as that would be funny. Turbines stars Igor Breakenback and Bianca Bradley and is due for release at the start of October.



Heavy metal frontman Ven Scott's short horror film Date from Hell is now available to watch for free on both Facebook and YouTube. This eleven minute horror is about a couple on date night who end up running into a roving serial killer.

 

A teaser trailer has dropped for anthology film Realm of Shadows, with all the shorts here said to be based on real events. It stars Tony Todd (West of Hell, Candyman) as a Catholic priest who has to go against the 'diabolic' alter ego of his close friend Robby. It also features Vida Ghaffari as the muse of Master Makin who has tension with her acolyte Corey.

 

Finally, in what has been a trailer filled month of little details comes the trailer for Joe Raffa's Dark Harbor. In this one a heavily pregnant woman returns to her childhood home island off the coast of Maine to face her mother, and attend her father's funeral. It is here she discovers a dark family secret. This had its world premiere at the Catalina Film Festival earlier this month.

And the Birds Rained Down (2019 EIFF 1)

Watch Movies TV -


Wow!

It’s almost October and I finally watched my first four-star film of 2019. I assumed the Edmonton International Film Festival (EIFF) would offer at least one (hopefully more) of those, but I’ve already watched twelve films here (including the winner of the Palme d’Or) and it’s the only four-star film so far.

That first four-star offering is a small French-Canadian film from director Louise Archambault. And the Birds Rained Down is a stunningly beautiful film, and I am not primarily referring to the cinematography (though it is excellent). I am referring to the profound observations about life, about love, about art, about aging, about friendship, about memory and about healing. 

76-year-old Gertrude (Andrée Lachapelle) has been wrongfully institutionalized most of her life. But when her brother dies, her nephew, Steve (Éric Robidoux), sneaks her out and brings her to his lodge, located deep in the woods of central Quebec. Nearby live two old hermits (Tom, played  by Rémy Girard, and Charlie, played by Gilbert Sicotte). A third hermit living in the area (Ted) has recently died and Steve suggests his aunt could live in Ted’s cabin. There is some consternation. More consternation follows when a photographer/researcher (Rafaëlle, played by Ève Landry), researching the impact, decades later, of a catastrophic forest fire, shows up in search of Ted, one of the fire’s survivors. The sudden presence of the two women will profoundly impact the lives of Tom and Charlie.

The slow pace of And the Birds Rained Down is absolutely perfect, the cinematography and music is exactly right, and the acting of Lachapelle, Girard and Sicotte is sublime, with Landry impressing as well. Based on a novel by Jocelyne Saucier, Archambault’s writing is likewise masterful. 

There are some minor flaws in the film, mostly involving the character of Steve, but they are not worth elaborating on. And the Birds Rained Down is a magical Canadian film that I recommend to everyone. **** My mug is held high for what is, for the moment, my favourite film of 2019. 

Movie Review: Monos

Watch Movies TV -
Monos **** / *****
Directed by: Alejandro Landes.
Written by: Alejandro Landes and Alexis Dos Santos.
Starring: Sofia Buenaventura (Rambo), Moises Arias (Patagrande – Bigfoot), Julianne Nicholson (Doctora Sara Watson), Laura Castrillon (Sueca – Swede), Deiby Rueda (Pitufo – Smurf), Paul Cubides (Perro – Dog), Sneider Castro (Boom Boom), Karen Quintero (Leidi – Lady), Julian Giraldo (Lobo – Wolf), Wilson Salazar (Mensejero), Jorge Roman (Buscador de Oro), Valeria Diana Solomonoff (Periodosta).
 
Monos is a film that takes place in the wilds of Columbia – for the first half on a cloudy, wet mountaintop, and for the second half, in the jungle. It focuses on a group of child soldiers – who work for something referred to only as “The Organization”. The purpose of this group is to watch over an American hostage – known for most of its runtime only as Doctora (Julianne Nicholson). The group mainly though just parties – they drink, they dance, they fire off their automatic rifles into the nothingness around them. They are children, playing a real world, adult game – but that is what they are doing – playing. They all have nicknames – mainly juvenile ones like Rambo, Smurf, Boom Boom, etc. The film never tries to tie any of this to any kind of real world politics. It’s not interested in that.
 
The film opens with a bizarre training montage – where the groups adult contact with the Organization, runs them through their exercises, before he leaves them to their own devices. They have two jobs – keep the American hostage alive, and keep the cow they have been gifted alive. What follows are those parties – where they dance around like untamed animals. Things start to go awry when the cow is killed, and shortly thereafter, the groups teenage leader kills himself. The group that seemed tightknit starts falling apart from this power vacuum, as no one is quite sure how to proceed.
 
Nicholson is given a difficult role here, and plays it well. In one sense, she is the only adult in the room so to speak, but she is also the one with the least amount of power. The children are seemingly nice to her – or as nice as you can be while still holding someone hostage. She indulges them somewhat – but never really sympathizes with them, and is always planning her escape. They are children, and she knows that, but they are also her captors – the ones preventing her from leaving, and she knows that as well.
 
The first half of the film – on that mountain – is in many ways dreamlike. The cinematography is gorgeous here – with the drifting clouds hovering around the mountain. The atmosphere is aided greatly by the score by Mica Levi – who adds another great score to her young career, following Under the Skin and Jackie. That half comes to an end is absolute chaos – a raid on the mountain, explosions, and gunfire – although director Alejandro Landes makes the decision to mainly stick with Doctora, and her overseer for this time, in an underground bunker as the chaos plays outside. The second half, set in the jungle, is even more chaotic – as Doctora tries to escape, and the group slowly implodes. Levi’s score grows more thunderous as the movie escalates.
 
In some ways, the film is a kind of Lord of the Flies tale – with children, left on their own, replaying the adult savagery they have witnessed. The child soliders don’t have much individual personality – they are more personality types than people, really – although the mounting chaos separates them as the characters are forced to make decisions. The decision to not make the film overtly political doesn’t always work – I felt in a film like Beasts of No Nation, the attempt to make things universal failed, because the characters kept talking around specifics that would undeniably have been said in the real world. Here though – it works. There is no set political ideology here, no real ideals at all. These children have been drawn into a world that they don’t understand – but they kind of don’t care to understand. For the moment, they are happy to be partying with their friends – a part of something bigger, even if they don’t care what that bigger something is. And the filmmaking draws you in – there are many close-ups of the children’s mud splattered faces, where they really do feel young – and then shots of the vast wilderness that surrounds them, engulfs them, and swallows them whole.

Movie Review: Downton Abbey

Watch Movies TV -
Downton Abbey *** / *****
Directed by: Michael Engler.
Written by: Julian Fellowes based on characters created by Fellowes.
Starring: Michelle Dockery (Lady Mary Talbot), Tuppence Middleton (Lucy Smith), Maggie Smith (Violet Crawley), Matthew Goode (Henry Talbot), Elizabeth McGovern (Cora Crawley), Laura Carmichael (Lady Edith), Allen Leech (Tom Branson), Kate Phillips (Princess Mary), Joanne Froggatt (Anna Bates), Imelda Staunton (Maud Bagshaw), Max Brown (Richard Ellis), Robert James-Collier (Thomas Barrow), Raquel Cassidy (Miss Baxter), Hugh Bonneville (Robert Crawley, Earl of Grantham), Sophie McShera (Daisy Mason), Geraldine James (Queen Mary), Jim Carter (Mr. Carson), Brendan Coyle (Mr. Bates), Phyllis Logan (Mrs. Hughes), Simon Jones (King George V), Stephen Campbell Moore (Captain Chetwode), Penelope Wilton (Isobel Merton), Susan Lynch (Miss Lawton), David Haig (Mr Wilson), Mark Addy (Mr. Bakewell), Michael Fox (Andy Parker), Lesley Nicol (Mrs. Patmore), James Cartwright (Tony Sellick), Harry Hadden-Paton (Bertie Hexham), Kevin Doyle (Mr. Molesley), Fifi Hart (Sybbie), Philippe Spall (Monsieur Courbet), Perry Fitzpatrick (Chris Webster), Oliver Barker (George), Alice McCarthy (Nanny Harewood), Douglas Reith (Lord Merton), Richenda Carey (Mrs. Webb), Marina Baibara (Baroness Valerenay), Andrew Havill (Henry Lascelles), Eva Samms (Marigold).
 
As someone who has never seen an episode of Downton Abbey, I am clearly not the target audience for the film version of the beloved British TV show, that arrived in theaters last week and was as much fan service as any Marvel movie, with a cast size to match. I saw the film because my wife was a fan of the show, and she seems to be the only woman in North America who has no other female friends who watched the show (she has many friends – but somehow, they all passed on this show) – and so I went in to see the film cold, knowing the music more than I know any of the characters. As a film unto itself, Downton Abbey is fine, I guess. I could follow along with the plot, and got the main character relations fairly quickly, and even found myself entertained, and sometimes amused, by the film – without ever really being involved in it emotionally. I take it that fans of the show really enjoyed it – and that’s good, that’s who it’s here for.
 
The basic plot of the movie is that the King and Queen of England are coming to Downton Abbey to witness a parade, have a dinner, and spend the night. Even if this house isn’t as wealthy as it once was, they still have enough to have an enormous staff, and be able to pull off one of these large scale Royal visits. The staff of Downton Abbey is upset, because it appears that the Royal staff will arrive, and do all of the work – and they will be shunted off to the side. The family itself has its own concerns – the Commoner driver from Ireland, who married one of the daughters, who died in childbirth, is Irish – and a Republican, so perhaps he could cause troubles. The matriarch, Violet (Maggie Smith, who I gather played the same basic role in the series as she did so wonderfully in Gosford Park) wants to sit down with a previously never mentioned cousin (Imelda Staunton) because she plans to leave her vast estate to her maid, instead of to Violet’s son Robert (Hugh Bonneville), who is her closest living relative. And oldest daughter Mary (Michelle Dockery) is wondering if it isn’t time to give up Downton Abbey, and lead a more normal life. And there are more subplots – many, many more subplots – that all play out of the two-hour runtime of the film.
 
I think one of the problems with the film is that film is simply a different medium from TV. In TV, you can have these types of enormous casts, because you don’t really need to give them all screen time and subplots every episode – sometimes, you’ll likely barely see some major characters for a few episodes, etc. But in a two-hour film, that is perhaps meant to be the last time we ever see these characters (which, given the box office success, I doubt) you have to squeeze everyone in, so that no fans favorite characters are left out. When you add in the fact that they also have to add in many more characters – not just the King and Queen, but their daughter, her stick-in-the-mud husband, their staff, the aforementioned cousin and her maid, etc. – and it sometimes feels like the movie is made up of a bunch of 30 second scenes jammed together to ensure that everyone gets something to do.
 
This is what made me think of the last two Avengers movies – Infinity War and Endgame. Yes, some characters get more screen time than others, but everyone needs to get their face in there – everyone needs their moment, etc. It all leads to so many subplots, that it risks not being a movie with anything really to say. Overall though, I think Downton Abbey threads the needle nicely. It’s a fun little film, even for someone like me, who senses as they watched that they are missing much of the fun, because they don’t have to backstory to make any of this connect. I left mainly having a good time, without really wanting to venture back and watch six seasons of television to figure out everything I missed.

Movie Review: Abominable

Watch Movies TV -
Abominable *** / *****
Directed by: Jill Culton.
Written by: Jill Culton.
Starring: Chloe Bennet (Yi), Albert Tsai (Peng), Tenzing Norgay Trainor (Jin), Joseph Izzo (Everest), Sarah Paulson (Dr. Zara), Eddie Izzard (Burnish), Michelle Wong (Yi's Mom), Tsai Chin (Nai Nai).
 
There’s no real point in trying to claim that DreamWorks latest animated product for kids – Abominable – really does anything to break the mold in terms of children’s animation, nor DreamWorks own model, which is to make charming films like this, and then stay out of the way of Disney and Pixar, to make money off them, while creating characters that will make adorable plush toys your kids will bug you for. That is pretty much precisely what Abominable is. What it also is though is charming and funny and heartwarming, and doesn’t feel like the warmed up leftovers that films like The Secret Life of Pets 2 or Angry Birds 2 did this summer, nor like the cheapie, cynical cash grabs of things like Ugly Dolls or Wonder Park. DreamWorks hasn’t found their latest How to Train Your Dragon – this isn’t (or at least, shouldn’t be) a massive franchise starter here – but it reminds you that they can make sweet and charming little films.
 
The story is well-trod territory. Plucky outsider Yi (Chloe Bennet), sad over the recent death of her father, meets an adorable child Yeti, that she names Everest, because that is clearly where he is form. Everest had escaped from the clothes of a greedy millionaire, who wanted to show him off to the world. Yi decides to try and get Everest back to Everest, from the Island (almost definitely Hong Kong, although that is never stated) and starts a cross China journey to get there – along with her adorable pal Peng (Albert Tsai) and Peng’s image obsessed cousin, Jin (Tenzing Norgay Trainor) – all the while pursued by that millionaire and his minions.
 
Yes, you know where this movie is going from the start – and the film doesn’t offer a lot in the way of narrative surprise along the way. And yet, director Jill Culton has crafted a sweet, funny little film here – one that doesn’t just use its Chinese locale as a cynical attempt to tap into the lucrative Chinese market, but does give the film a unique backdrop along the way on this journey. And Everest is, of course, absolutely adorable – basically a giant, slobbering puppy with magical powers that we discover along the way (as we discover those powers, you may ask why he doesn’t use them from the start of the journey to make things easier – but don’t ask such silly questions that would negate the movie).
 
Sometimes, clichés are clichés for a reason – so even if plucky outsider, who puts on a hard exterior to mask the pain they feel inside, is a cliché – for Yi here, it really does work. She misses her beloved father, who always wanted to take her on a trip like this, and now her doing so allows herself to reconnect to him – and with the other things he loves, like the violin, which she plays beautifully. Peng and Jin are basically there for comic relief – and they work fine for that. The greedy millionaire (voiced by Eddie Izzard), and his lackeys (led by Sarah Paulson) do have at least a surprise or two up their sleeve as the film movies along.
 
Sure, Abominable is a corporate product – one that is designed to sell toys, along with tickets, and its easy to be cynical of films like this. But perhaps just because I really was almost irrationally annoyed by films like Pets 2 and Angry Birds 2 and Ugly Dolls and Wonder Park, but Abominable hit that animated sweet spot for me – allowing me to enjoy a film like this with my kids on a lazy Saturday afternoon, without feeling as if I am pledging allegiance to a massive corporation intent on brainwashing my kids. Abominable does nothing new, but everything well – and sometimes, that’s enough for films like this.

Movie Review: Luz

Watch Movies TV -
Luz *** ½ / *****
Directed by: Tilman Singer   
Written by: Tilman Singer.
Starring: Luana Velis (Luz Carrara), Johannes Benecke (Olarte), Jan Bluthardt (Dr. Rossini), Lilli Lorenz (Margarita), Julia Riedler (Nora Vanderkurt), Nadja Stübiger (Bertillon). 
 
Luz is an announcement of a major new talent in the horror genre. First time director Tilman Singer has made a daring, stylistic film that makes me immediately curious of anything he does next. As a film unto itself, Luz is good – it’s got a masterful opening act, a daring if not altogether successful middle act, and a fine denouement. It’s clear that narrative isn’t really what Singer is going for here – the film is a possession story of a kind, but Singer is more interested in pushing the boundaries of what he can do stylistically with little to no money than he is at telling that story. This is a story more about mood than about story. Even though the film only runs 70 minutes, it almost feels like it would have been better at half that length. But what’s on display here is so promising, that I forgive Luz it’s few missteps as I cannot wait to see what Singer does next.
 
The opening act of Luz is clearly the best part in the movie. Over a masterful 20-25 minutes or so, Singer cuts back and forth from two different scenes – ones that often play out in long shots with only a few characters. In one of the scenes, Luz (Luana Velis) wanders into a police department – and is very clearly either disturbed, drunk or high – or some combination thereof. She is bloody and bruised, wearing a backwards cap and at first talks to the uncaring desk sergeant (I don’t even think he looks up) – with her profane ranting. In the other, a woman – Nora Vanderkurt (Julia Riedler) talks to a psychologist, Dr. Rossini (Jan Bluthardt) at a bar, where they are the only patrons, and it looks like it could be a bar in a warehouse somewhere. Nora tells the doctor about her old friend Luz – what she did when they were at boarding school together, and how they met all these years later by chance, when Nora gets into her taxi. The doctor is intrigued – at first he thinks this woman maybe trying to pick him up, but then her story is even more gripping than that.
 
The second act of the movie is the police interrogation of Luz. They call in Dr. Rossini to place her under hypnosis, and tell them what happened in that cab this night – and where Nora is now. What follows is kind of bizarre – Luz tells her story of what happened in real time – we hear what she heard at that time, but see here in this large room acting it out.
 
I’m pretty sure we never actually figure out everything that happened in that cab, and the end of the film, as creepily effective as it is, doesn’t really bother to explain much either. It does, of course, all tie back to what was done as teenagers – that profane chant Luz says, that summoned a demon, who all these years later, wants nothing more than to get back to her. Singer gives you enough information to piece enough together so that it makes sense – but not so that everything is clear.
 
That’s okay really – this movie really isn’t about its plot, which if you sit down and think about it is just another run-of-the-mill possession story. We’ve seen so many of them at this point, that it’s actually kind of a relief that Singer didn’t make us sit through another 20-25 minutes of movie that would nothing except a clear, linear plot line, and distract from what Singer does well.
 
The style of Luz is what immediately grabs you. Singer is clearly influenced by everyone from Dario Argento to Andrezej Zulawski, without really being beholden to any of them. That opening shot – it goes on for roughly five minutes of Luz entering the police station, is truly haunting. All the stuff in the bar is masterfully shot, slowly drawing out the tension with a series of long takes.
 
In a way, the movie never recovers from those early scenes – had the whole movie been that good, this would be one of the best films of the year, and it’s not. The middle section is strange – it’s Singer yet again, pushing stylistic boundaries, but in a way that’s more interesting than involving, as Luz’s miming of everything places a barrier between her and the audience. It’s a rather audacious choice – and who knows, maybe it was made for budgetary reasons (it has to be cheaper shooting the scene in a non-descript room with a couple of chairs, than actually out on the highway) – and Singer doesn’t back away from it. He goes all out. But if you were on the edge of your seat for the first part, you relax a little in the second. The ending gives you chills – it’s a great way to end the film, bringing it full circle.
 
In short, Luz is the type of low budget horror film a first time director can make to show off their skills, and hopefully get more work. And I really hope Singer does – he is a unique talent, unafraid of risks, and doing something different in the horror genre than we see elsewhere. I cannot wait to see what he does next.

Movie Review: The Edge of Democracy

Watch Movies TV -
The Edge of Democracy *** ½ / *****
Directed by: Petra Costa.
Written by: Petra Costa and Carol Pires and David Barker and Moara Passoni and Daniela Capelato and Antonia Pellegrino and Virginia Primo.
 
Petra Costa’s sad, contemplative documentary about Brazil’s recent slide into right wing demagoguery is a film that seems like it was made for the express purpose of exporting to people who aren’t in Brazil. As a look into the scandals, real, imagined or a mixture of both, that rocked Brazil – leading one popular former President to be jailed, a current President to be impeached, and the rise of Brazil’s Trump – The Edge of Democracy doesn’t really go much past the surface level. Hell, I’m not even sure it goes that far – for all the time devoted to “Operation Car Wash” that took down the left leaning presidents, the film never really does let you know where it stands on their culpability and responsibility for it. It’s certainly not a film that anyone will claim is fair and balanced – giving both sides, and letting the audience decide, because it certainly does have a point-of-view. In a way though, that doesn’t really matter. The film is about hypocrisy, who the right uses the media to push their agenda, and how they hold others to different standards, etc. It is about the fragility of democratic institutions – ones that only maintain power if we believe in them, like they’re Tinkerbell. Otherwise they die. Costa has made her film about her own country – but it’s a warning to everyone outside of it, about how all this ends.
 
Costa’s voice is ever presented in the film – she narrates it all in a soft, sad voice. She does try and draw parallels to herself and Brazil’s democracy – they are the same age, being born in the mid-1980s, just as Brazil was coming out of decades of military rule. Her parents were activists who went into hiding in those years – but Costa is a child of privilege in many ways. Oddly, I kind of think Costa either had to go harder into drawing these parallels, or back off a little more. As it stands, it’s a half measure – and doesn’t always work.
 
Costa is on stronger ground when she tells the story first of President Lula, and especially his handpicked successor – Dilma Rousseff, Brazil’s first female President, and the one who will face impeachment after she narrowly wins re-election in 2014, and her opponent goes overboard claiming the results are legitimate. Her regime was scandal ridden – but did she actually do anything wrong? Was it Lula – was it others? When her opponents are pressed as to why she should be impeached, they don’t have much of real import to say – it’s more about her personality and style, rather than doing anything wrong. When she is impeached, and similar charges of corruption are leveled at the new President – and 80% of the Brazilian people want him investigated – the same politicians who voted to impeach her, vote not to even investigate him. They cannot keep changing Presidents willy-nilly you know.
 
It’s the cynicism that leads to the rise of someone like Bolsanaro - a man who will say anything just to gain power, and doesn’t care. He’s a liar, you know she’s a liar, but what are you going to do about it? He’s able to whip everyone into a nationalistic frenzy, and then capitalize on it.
 
The Edge of Democracy is a sad film – and yet one that ends with at least a little hope. If Democracy dies when you stop believing in it, you can bring it back when you do believe in it. Brazil is in dark days right now – hell, America is there too, and there’s many places around the world that are there. Costa’s film is a warning about where it’s heading – with at least a little bit of hope to get out of it.

Recap of INTERNAL MEDICINE FILM FESTIVAL 2019: Artful Advocacies

Watch Movies TV - September 30, 2019





For the artistic program of the St. Luke's Medical Center Global City Dept. of Medicine celebration of Medicine Week this year, overall chairperson Dr. Ian Homer Cua (GI) decided to hold an "Internal Medicine Film Festival" for the first time. Consultants and residents of Internal Medicine and its various subspecialties served as the writers and actors of all these films. There was only one director for all the films in competition, Emir Kahn Bautista, who is noted for his wedding photos and videos. 

In ceremonies held at the Henry Sy Auditorium at the fifth floor of the SLMC-BGC, the film fest was formally inaugurated today at 12 noon when the bell was rung by Dr. Cua, Dr. Michael Villa (Endocrine, Chair of the Dept. of Medicine, SLMC-BGC), Dr. Deborah David-Ona (Cardio, VP for Medical Practice Group and Assistant Chief Medical Officer, SLMC-BGC) and Dr. Gina Nazareth (Nephro, current Phil. College of Physicians President). The emcees of the event were Dr. Vimar Luz (Nephro) and Dr. Helen Ong-Garcia (Cardio). 

Judging will be based on message, originality, screenplay and acting. The members of the Board of Jurors: Marivin Arayata (GMA VP for Entertainment TV), Suzette Doctolero (GMA creative director), Pinky Pe Tobiano (philanthropist, chemist, businesswoman and consumer safety advocate), Ricardo Lo (showbiz writer Phil. Star), Keren Pascual (writer and PR maven), Darryl Yap (who just made his debut as a feature film director in the box office hit "#Jowable") and yours truly, Fred Hawson. The chairman of the Board of Jurors is Jerry Sineneng, veteran director of various films (like "Maybe This Time") and TV shows (like "Kadenang Ginto").

The four short films in competition were:

1. MISS CONCEPCION

Written by: Dr. Vimar Luz
Blue Team
Advocacy: HIV-AIDS

Because of some suspicious findings in her blood and xray, Nicole Concepcion (Dr. Carmela Vistal) was requested by her doctor to have an HIV test. While her best friend Luis (Dr. Jolly Santos) remained very supportive, her husband Manuel (Dr. Rod Castro) was nowhere to be found. 

The three lead actors really poured on the heavy drama in their portrayal of three individuals caught up in the HIV web -- the promiscuous partner, the unsuspecting victim and the supportive friend -- with a twist. A fourth character was Nicole's imperious mother Felicity Alicante played with scene-stealing aplomb by cardiologist Dr. Mylene Cornel. Cameos by some big-shot consultants as a series of anonymous gay partners of one of the characters definitely surprised and amused those in the audience who recognized them. 





**********


2. NOT TODAY

Written by: RT Tipones, MD
Advocacy: Mental Health
Green Team

An aloof young lady doctor named Alex, cannot seem to get her miserable mind straight. Instead, over the days, she would drop her stuffed toys one by one out of the window down to the street below. One day, she just threw her last toy out. What's next? 

Of all the films in competition, this was the one that looked the most technically polished. From the very first scene of Alex walking towards the edge of a skyscraper rooftop, you would be impressed with the cinematography. The editing of scenes that flitted between reality and pathologic fantasy was also very clean. Dr. Marian Dimabuyu's face effectively projected the mental confusion of her character Alex. The performance of writer Dr. RT Tipones as Alex's spurned suitor Francis was remarkable, especially in the surprise epilogue.




**********



3. ANGHEL SA ALAPAAP

Written by: Eibbron Lu, MD
Advocacy: Illicit Drug Use
Yellow Team

Angel's father was a drug addict and wife-abuser. His long-suffering mother eventually could not take all the beating, and decided to leave him, taking Angel with her. On that one day that Angel visited his father, the police also decided to come to arrest him and his gang.

This film attempted to create the grit of those anti-drug films produced over the past two years as a result of the government's drug war. Pulmonologist Dr. Ronald Reodica was frighteningly intense as the abusive father. Endocrinologist Dr. Joy Fontanilla nailed a most realistic performer as the aggrieved wife and mother. Cardiologist Dr. George Cordova played a tough policeman, but also had a scene reminiscing about a bitter past. Unusual for a medical advocacy film though, it never touched the medical aspects of drug abuse, only the social aspects. There was also no redemption felt after everything.





**********



4. MY ROMANTIC BABOY

Written by: Minnie San Juan, MD
Advocacy: Obesity
Red Team

Jennifer was a morbidly obese woman who had a constant craving for sweets. When it came to exercise, she would rather conveniently forget about it. However, one night just as she was about to go to a date, fate had other plans for her.

Of the four entries in this filmfest, this was the one with lightest, comic vibe, which made it stand out. This was practically a one-woman show for IM resident Dr. Marga Laconico as Jennifer, who huffed and puffed practically throughout the whole duration of the film in a cumbersome fat suit, which probably made her lose weight in real life. A very natural actress, Dr. Laconico had a strong and winsome screen presence which made us all root for her character to overcome her food addiction and weight problems. 






**********

Winners for Best Picture, Best Screenplay, Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor and Actress will be announced on Firday, October 5, 2019 during the Awards Night. 


Coherence (2013)

Quick Sips - Fireside Magazine #71

Watch Movies TV -
Art by Mariana Palova
The September Fireside Magazine breaks a bit from the usual mold, in that three of the stories are translations (all from Spanish, I believe). Together, the stories and poetry paint something of a grim picture, revealing hungers and traumas, lies and fears and doubts. The characters are often put in situations where they're trying to figure out how to be themselves, how to walk the line between performance and identity, and never exactly coming away with a clear answer or map. The works are challenging and wrenching but often fun as well, emotionally charged in different ways. So let's get to the reviews!

Stories:

“Shelter, Sustenance, Self” by Aimee Ogden (823 words)

No Spoilers: Phil was a young father with a tragic illness. A clear candidate for a procedure to take his memories, his mental patterns, and try to transfer them into an artificial body. To allow him to live. But what made Phil...well, Phil, might not be something that can be transferred from body to body. The piece explores the implications of the procedure, and what is left, and the decisions that still need to be made, the feelings that remain even when everything else is lost. It’s a touching, short read, full of warmth in the face of a rather pervasive cold.
Keywords: Memories, CW- Terminal Illness, Family, Transferred Consciousnesses
Review: This is an interesting story of a transferred consciousness, where the narrator doesn’t think of themself as Phil, but also doesn’t really know who they are. They are the compilation of Phil’s memories and experiences but none of the specific context. They are his memories but not his preferences, not his likes and dislikes, and in any event their senses are not Phil’s senses. They’re different, and in that difference they know that they aren’t the man who they were supposed to be. And it’s fascinating to me the space the story explores, looking at this new person as separate from Phil but also, because of their shared memories, wanting to honor Phil’s memory. Even when, as here, that means basically lying to everyone that Phil cared about and pretending to be Phil. Which is sort of fucked up, but definitely carries some emotional weight, because it looks at how Phil wanted so badly to provide for his daughter, to make sure that she had a father, that the narrator decides to go forward as Phil because that will be the closest thing they can manage. And there’s so much tucked into that, into the admission they make that they’re afraid, but that they’re going to try to do this thing, to be a father to Phil’s daughter, because they remember how much it meant to all of them. Not sure what exactly that means with Phil’s wife, Mira, and probably for the best that the story doesn’t really explore this, because it’s a lean piece and that would certainly bog things down, as much as I hope that the narrator isn’t going to lie to her as well. Because while the decision to _be_ Phil is one that they’re making for a fairly compelling reason, I feel like there’s a difference between wanting to honor the dead and lying to someone about being their spouse when you aren’t. In any event, though, the story is short but moving, quickly establishing the world and the science and providing a powerful look at consciousness, memories, and relationships. A great read!

“Chickens” by Raquel Castro, translated by Julia Rios (382 words)

No Spoilers: This very short piece deals with a small village here chickens have begun to disappear. Suspicion falls, as it often does, on an old woman who lives on the outskirts of town, doña Martha. Framed as something of an urban legend, something of a campfire story, the piece twists expectations nicely, managing an edge of creeping horror that carries beyond, slipping free and reminding the reader that not every urban legend will melt back into mundanity if delved deeply enough.
Keywords: Chickens, Transformations, Nahuals, Stories
Review: I really like the way this very short story manages to defy expectations. Because in some ways it follows the line for a lot of PSA-style “the more you know” narratives where the people who are spreading rumors about the old woman in town have to learn that she’s not a monster and shouldn’t be targeted just because she’s vulnerable. And instead, well, the story takes that and...well, I don’t think it reverses it, really. I don’t think that the story says that old women living mostly on their own should be targeted because they’re all monsters. Again, the story does place the “lesson” being learned on the boys who were spreading gossip, but doesn’t really give them a redemption arc. Instead it makes them examples of what not to do. Don’t gossip and don’t target the vulnerable is still as I see it the point, but the carrot of understanding has been replaced by the switch of monsters will straight up eat you. And that if you’re going to see monsters in the vulnerable, then at least own that you don’t actually believe that they are monsters. Because if you did you’d take precautions. You wouldn’t be so brazen. It’s a call, to me, to really own your actions, and to treat everyone well not only because it’s the right thing to do but because some people might actually be nahuals and they might devour you should your plans veer to close to visiting violence on them or theirs. Again, it’s a really quick piece, and more fun than anything, but I like how it still works as a sort of fairy tale, a morality story, but tinged with a power for those normally left powerless. A wonderful read!

“City of the Angels” by Libia Brenda, translated by Julia Rios (943 words)

No Spoilers: Split between two time periods (one in the 1500s, one in the 1700s), this story explores a place, Puebla de los Ángeles, and its connections to the divine. In the first piece, the actual angels debate the merits of establishing a base of operations in then New Spain, and in the second, a young monk writes to a friend about how he finds the city two hundred years on. And it seeks to map a bit not just the place but the roles of the angels in human affairs, their affiliation with human religions, and purpose and aim of their mission. And it asks in fairly blatant terms what role the angels have in periods where it seems they must be looking away.
Keywords: Angels, Cities, Debate, Religion, Victims
Review: I don’t often see stories that take on the actual angels as characters, and it’s interesting to see their debate in the first half of the story. Because it does question what role angels should play in the affairs of the world. It pokes at their allegiances, and places them in the context of the religions that act using their names. In this New Spain, after all, the conquistadors have done awful things, and it seems in some ways like the angels are working with them, concerned not about the damage being done but about their own influence. Except the piece looks at the historical and religious roots of the city, the supposed inspiration for its founding, and draws lines to a cause a bit more noble than the colonization of the Americas. Because here the angels are not the forces driving that colonizations but beings witnessing the events going on and wanting to do things to help those in need. To side with the victims of war, knowing that at least by having a presence in the ground they can try to do more good than from their vantage high above. The second part then draws things to the fully human realm and the ways that the angels seem to work, influencing and inspiring people where they can to make this city and the larger world a place with more compassion and help. At least for me it seems that the monk is being filled with some of the power of the angels, nudged to take action to try and help those being prejudiced against and oppressed. It’s a complex story, one that takes a look at history and religion and doesn’t veer into cynicism, but instead looks at what good these angels can do, even amid injustice and violence. Definitely a piece to spend some time with!

“The Box” by Iliana Vargas, translated by Julia Rios (1793 words)

No Spoilers: The narrator of this story is just a passenger on a bus until they’re asked the time by a fellow passenger and end up being pulled into a strange story about the delivery of bugs. Bugs that definitely don’t seem normal, that are part of something that seems large and dangerous. And yet as the narrator listens to the woman who seems to be a courier in this system, they find that they can’t resist following along and seeing what happens. Which ends up being either a mistake or exactly the adventure they were looking for. The piece is weird but also compelling, the story by this small woman about her exploits haunting and a bit tragic, but also limned with magic. It’s a piece that a bit of a mystery, and fascinating to behold.
Keywords: Transport, Time, Bugs, Deliveries, Scars
Review: There’s a part of me that doesn’t know quite what to make of this story, the strangeness of it, the way that this random person on a bus, who seems like they might be a bit of a weirdo, turns out to be a person engaged in this rather extreme situation where they’re transporting dangerous bugs across the city. It’s work that has taken its toll on them physically, though they are resolved to do it, or resigned to do it, or something like that. More, though, I feel like the story is playing with the idea that she’s just this random person. An immigrant to wherever the story takes place. A person who most people wouldn’t stop to talk to, who the narrator doesn’t want to stop and talk to. And yet someone who’s a part of something dark and terrible, who loses parts of her body, who is punished if she cannot meet standards that aren’t under her control. For me the piece becomes about the narrator really seeing this person and instead of rejecting empathy, begins to understand what it’s like. Starts to see the full horror all around them, that this is something going on in their city, on their buses, that people are being mutilated and risking death probably just for a chance to live. Because they have no other options. I love the way the story captures this woman’s mentality about the job, that it’s completely unreasonable but also, shrug, what are you going to do? It’s what she knows how to do now, regardless of how much it hurts her, how certain it is to kill her eventually. It’s a sharp and rather horrifying look at this moment in time that is still full of a kind of magic that has before been ignored and hidden because only the rich can afford it and only the very poor are destroyed by it, rendering it rather invisible. A fantastic read!

Poetry:

“Questions to Grow Up On” by Ashley Deng

This piece uses structure to create an experience of being spoken to from two sides, each opposed in some ways, each trying to push the second person you of the poem out of that particular group and into some other imaged space that, as it becomes more and more clear as the piece flows, doesn’t exist at all. The subject of the poem here, the “you” that is being spoken to and who, in turn, seems to be speaking out to the readers of the piece, is caught between worlds and cultures, diasporas and identities, gatekept because of how they look at the assumptions that their appearance invokes in others. They aren’t allowed to be who they are, because to the wider population who they are doesn’t exist. The world is broken up into hard lines and borders, so that people who are of mixed race are pressured to pick one thing to be. Except that, here, the subject doesn’t get that option, either, because no matter what they would pick, they are told that they are wrong. That they need to pick again. That certainly there is a mistake. Because they don’t look right, don’t have the right experiences, the right history, the right...and the poem interrogates that, shows the pressure it puts the subject under, so that they have no community, no place to belong, rejected from either side because of an assumption that they will have other, better choices. That their desire to belong in one of the groups they belong in is some sort of affectation or appropriation, which is effectively a violence done to them. A way of stripping them of a place to have an identity. So that the piece is also them pleading, asking, where they should go, how they can reclaim the things that have been taken, how they can find a way to feel right? To which there is no good answer, because people believe in clear distinctions, bold borders that can’t, or shouldn’t, be crossed, not realizing that so many live in the spaces between and across borders, looking for space that is so often denied them, which only furthers historical and contemporary injustices. It’s a story that looks at the mess that identity can be and asks that the reader sit with that and seek to answer the questions that many seem to think are so easy, that are actually impossible. A wonderful read!

---